Reach Your Academic Goals.
Connect to the brainpower of an academic dream team. Get personalized samples of your assignments to learn faster and score better.
Register an account on the Studyfy platform using your email address. Create your personal account and proceed with the order form.
Just fill in the blanks and go step-by-step! Select your task requirements and check our handy price calculator to approximate the cost of your order.
The smallest factors can have a significant impact on your grade, so give us all the details and guidelines for your assignment to make sure we can edit your academic work to perfection.
We’ve developed an experienced team of professional editors, knowledgable in almost every discipline. Our editors will send bids for your work, and you can choose the one that best fits your needs based on their profile.
Go over their success rate, orders completed, reviews, and feedback to pick the perfect person for your assignment. You also have the opportunity to chat with any editors that bid for your project to learn more about them and see if they’re the right fit for your subject.
Track the status of your essay from your personal account. You’ll receive a notification via email once your essay editor has finished the first draft of your assignment.
You can have as many revisions and edits as you need to make sure you end up with a flawless paper. Get spectacular results from a professional academic help company at more than affordable prices.
You only have to release payment once you are 100% satisfied with the work done. Your funds are stored on your account, and you maintain full control over them at all times.
Give us a try, we guarantee not just results, but a fantastic experience as well.
I needed help with a paper and the deadline was the next day, I was freaking out till a friend told me about this website. I signed up and received a paper within 8 hours!
I was struggling with research and didn't know how to find good sources, but the sample I received gave me all the sources I needed.
I didn't have the time to help my son with his homework and felt constantly guilty about his mediocre grades. Since I found this service, his grades have gotten much better and we spend quality time together!
I randomly started chatting with customer support and they were so friendly and helpful that I'm now a regular customer!
Chatting with the writers is the best!
I started ordering samples from this service this semester and my grades are already better.
The free features are a real time saver.
I've always hated history, but the samples here bring the subject alive!
I wouldn't have graduated without you! Thanks!
Not at all! There is nothing wrong with learning from samples. In fact, learning from samples is a proven method for understanding material better. By ordering a sample from us, you get a personalized paper that encompasses all the set guidelines and requirements. We encourage you to use these samples as a source of inspiration!
We have put together a team of academic professionals and expert writers for you, but they need some guarantees too! The deposit gives them confidence that they will be paid for their work. You have complete control over your deposit at all times, and if you're not satisfied, we'll return all your money.
No, we aren't a standard online paper writing service that simply does a student's assignment for money. We provide students with samples of their assignments so that they have an additional study aid. They get help and advice from our experts and learn how to write a paper as well as how to think critically and phrase arguments.
Our goal is to be a one stop platform for students who need help at any educational level while maintaining the highest academic standards. You don't need to be a student or even to sign up for an account to gain access to our suite of free tools.
An Analysis of the Morality Issue in The Scarlet Letter, a Novel by Nathaniel Hawthorne - Reviewer Center We have everything you need to write your first review, increase the visibility of your work through PLOS, and join the movement to advance Open Science. Get Started. PLOS Reviewer Center. Everything you need to know about peer review. A collection of free training and resources for peer reviewers of PLOS journals—and for the peer review community at large. Visit Reviewer Center. Sign-up for Journal Alerts. PLOS ONEeditors select potential reviewers based on their expertise in research areas relevant to the manuscript under consideration. Reviewer invitations are sent by email from the journal's Editorial Managersubmission system. interviewing prospective employees for you medical research business
Western Union money transfer: compensation and benefit challenges Research Paper - PLOS Pathogens editors select potential reviewers based on their expertise in research areas relevant to the manuscript under consideration. Reviewer invitations are sent by email from the journal's Editorial Manager submission system. Use the links in the invitation email to accept or decline, or check the “New Reviewer Invitations” folder on your Reviewer Main Menu screen in Editorial. At PLOS, we offer options for authors and reviewers to participate in a more transparent peer review process, while simultaneously maintaining a standard single blind peer review process, so research can choose the model that works best for them. There is a real need for more investigation into peer review. Visit the PLOS Reviewer Center to learn more about becoming a peer reviewer. Help If you have questions or concerns about the manuscript you are reviewing, or if you need assistance submitting the review, please email us. criminal justice definition essay
Birthday Wishes to Write in a Kids Birthday Card | - PLOS Reviewer Center “How to Review a Manuscript” video tutorial Accepting or declining invitations Reviewer invitations are sent by email from the submission system. The PLOS Writing Center is your source for scientific writing & publishing essentials. Learn how write a successful scientific research article with our free, practical guides and hands-on resources for authors looking to improve their scientific publishing skillset. Have you visited the PLOS Reviewer Center? This collection of training and resources is free for the peer review community at large, drawn from research and interviews with staff editors, editorial board members, and experienced reviewers. Research Essay on the Theory of Relativity help...?
neutralization experiment report long form - PLOS Medicine editors select potential reviewers based on their expertise in research areas relevant to the manuscript under consideration. Reviewer invitations are sent by email from the journal's Editorial Manager submission system. Use the links in the invitation email to accept or decline, or check the “New Reviewer Invitations” folder on your Reviewer Main Menu screen in Editorial. Submissions to the PLOS iGEM Collection will be posted for open review on the PLOS Collections blog and reviews will be posted as comments on the blog. For more information on the PLOS iGEM Collection please visit the collection page.. iGEM and PLOS are working together to give the student teams participating in the iGEM competition the option to publish their work in a persistent peer. If the editor had bothered to read the review it would be clear that the reviewer was not suitable for the role. We are very disappointed that he allowed this reviewer to have so much sway. PLoS ONE: weeks: weeks: n/a: 3: 3 (good) 4 (very good) Accepted: do my homework quiz
Story Map - ReadWriteThink - Jun 08, · By leaving the decision to opt-in for published peer review history with authors, we’ve seen a steady 39% opt-in rate among eligible manuscripts across all of PLOS. Of those 3, publications that agreed to participate in the last year, 60% have at least one signed review! May 22, · Starting today, ALL PLOS journals will offer authors the option to publish their peer review history alongside their accepted manuscript! We’ve been excited to make this announcement, and make major strides towards a more open publication process, since last fall when we signed ASAPbio’s open letter committing to transparent peer review options. Sep 26, · Another way is to visit the PLOS Peer Review Center where you can learn the basics of peer review and get helpful tips for handling reviewer tasks, from accepting a review invitation to completing your review. check url broken links report
The Differences between American Christmas Traditions and France Christmas Traditions - Dec 05, · This publication in PLOS ONE was my first paper that underwent the peer review process, and initially I was unsure on how the peer review process worked I hope that by publishing our peer review process, we can help demystify the entire process for fellow early career researchers in addition to shedding light on what reviewers may be looking. In , PLOS published more than 31, articles; each one required participation from at least one of the 85,+ contributors involved in the peer review process across the PLOS suite of journals. This reviewer community plays an integral role in advancing science by providing trusted, quality contributions to the publication process through. As a peer reviewer, the value that you bring to research communication is immense, and too often, unacknowledged. You deserve credit for all of your contributions to science--not just authorship. Starting today, when you register your ORCID iD in the PLOS Editorial Manager submission system, we’ll alert ORCID anytime you complete a peer review. Obesity in America
Medical Assistant Resume Samples Education - Peer Review Center; Writing Center; About PLOS; Search: Menu. When you choose to publish with PLOS, your research makes an impact. Make your work accessible to all, without restrictions, and accelerate scientific discovery with options like preprints and published peer review . PLOS One (stylized PLOS ONE, and formerly PLoS ONE) is a peer-reviewed open access scientific journal published by the Public Library of Science (PLOS) since The journal covers primary research from any discipline within science and farmertblogfc2com.gearhostpreview.com Public Library of Science began in with an online petition initiative by Nobel Prize winner Harold Varmus, formerly director of the. The efficacy and safety of a drug is highly impacted not only by how it is designed, but also by how and where it is delivered. In recent years there has been significant progress in the formulation of different drug delivery systems to improve the release and pharmacological profile of therapeutic drugs, reduce side effects, and enhance targeting to specific tissues and cell types. Dissertation section order - qslbuilder.com
What is considered to be the worst Beatles song? What is their worst album? - Jan 14, · Social contexts and environments have a critical influence on psychiatric morbidity. Whilst biological mechanisms can explain some aspects of psychiatric disorders, their influence is moderated by a myriad of societal factors. This Collection highlights research on the impact of social conditions on individuals' mental wellbeing, including epidemiological research on the predictors and. The problem started when I submitted a paper from my group, one which I know from experience meets all of the PLOS ONE publication criteria. Here is what happened. 24/10/ – paper submitted; 06/12/ – paper rejected based on a single word review, from a reviewer . PLOS BLOGS PLOS Collections. The PLOS Collections Blog provides a platform for Channels & Collection editors, authors and organisers – as well as the PLOS Channels & Collections Team – to blog about the research and commentary published in PLOS Channels & Collections. gre argument ---antibiotics study results
Hard topics for essays bible - dma partners - Jun 26, · When you choose to publish with PLOS, your research makes an impact. Make your work accessible to all, without restrictions, and accelerate scientific discovery with options like preprints and published peer review that make your work more Open. Peer reviewer center. Signed peer review. Peer review toolbox. Early Career Research Community Peer Review Week Time to Make Peer Review An Essential Part of the ECR Experience September 26, By Andreas Vilhelmsson With this year’s Peer Review Week coming to an end it can be a good idea to turn the focus and look. Sep 16, · Multidisciplinary Peer Review at PLOS ONE – improving the quality of peer review for interdisciplinary research September 16, Kaelyn Lemon, Erika Mann and Anna Simonin Peer Review Week As we celebrate Peer Review Week, we are grateful for the contributions of reviewers and editors across a vast number of disciplines who make peer review. Preschool Curriculum - Learning Objectives for 3 years
dissertation abstracts international new york - Nov 13, · On the eve of the UN Decade on Ecosystem Restoration, PLOS ONE is calling for submissions for a new Collection on Rewilding and Restoration. As environmental pressures intensify and efforts to restore and rewild expand, there is an urgent need for a rigorous and relevant scientific evidence base to inform practical decisions and policy-making. Nov 05, · I only interacted with Plos as reviewer. Several times I thought of being an author too, and I will. But my experience as a reviewer was great and the guidelines, the spirit of Plos for simplicity, honesty, and help to authors and transparency was very well communicated to me. I had good experience. Thank you, C. May 10, · This video shows PLOS ONE reviewers how to submit a review in Editorial Manager.. Useful links: View the PLOS ONE reviewer guidelines for more information about serving as a reviewer.; To access your review assignment or submit your review now, enter the PLOS ONE submission system.; Learn more and see more videos like this one on the PLOS ONE Video Shorts channel. Teen Pregnancy professional essay writing services
Questions about Middle School!? - PLOS NTDs is home to leading research on the world’s most neglected tropical diseases. Each year, we celebrate the impact our authors have had in these fields and share out the body of work that has earned the top 10% of citations. We hope you enjoy exploring this Collection. Aug 03, · We are delighted to host our first guest post on Biologue by James Rosindell and William D. Pearse from Silwood Park, Imperial College London. They share their view on how we might improve peer review. Elsevier recently announced a peer review farmertblogfc2com.gearhostpreview.com to all, the competition invites contestants to submit a word idea of how to improve the peer review system. Jul 14, · Michael Malim and Kasturi Haldar, Editors-in-Chief of PLOS Pathogens, share the journal’s plan to accelerate and amplify COVID research. Open and readily available research. This is a time of great challenges and great opportunities for scientists and clinicians working on COVID Being a Doctor dissertation examples
Writing a personal statement for medical school - PLOS is a nonprofit (c)(3) corporation, #C, and is based in San Francisco, California, US. May 13, · There were 4 RCTs testing the effects of revealing the peer reviewers’ identities (6, 14, 16, 17), and 1 study comparing a journal that uses single-blind peer review with one that reveals author and peer reviewer names, publishing the peer review report as part of the pre-publication history of articles accepted in the journal (9. Nov 19, · As PLOS ONE welcomes rigorous original research regardless of disciplinary boundaries, it is a home for education research. Our journal welcomes a variety of study designs and methods, including quantitative research, but importantly also for education research, mixed-methods and qualitative research. Buy The Essays Of Warren Buffett - Buy for others
Death Penalty write a essay online - Nov 30, · PLOS is a nonprofit (c)(3) corporation, #C, and is based in San Francisco, California, US. The world’s first multidisciplinary Open Access journal, PLOS ONE accepts scientifically rigorous research, regardless of farmertblogfc2com.gearhostpreview.com ONE’s broad scope provides a platform to publish primary research, including interdisciplinary and replication studies as well as negative farmertblogfc2com.gearhostpreview.com journal’s publication criteria are based on high ethical standards and the rigor of the methodology and. PLOS ECR (Early Career Researcher) Community, formerly The PLOS Student Blog, is a forum for the next generation of scientists and science writers. Starting in , we’ve changed the name of this blog site on PLOS BLOGS Network from The Student Blog to The PLOS ECR Community. How to type a research paper in mla
aa vehicle engineers report fha - Jul 02, · Peer Review Center; Writing Center; About PLOS; Search: Menu. When you choose to publish with PLOS, your research makes an impact. Make your work accessible to all, without restrictions, and accelerate scientific discovery with options like preprints and published peer review that make your work more Open. Dec 06, · To celebrate 12 months of cutting-edge science we’ve decided to round up our PLOS Biology cover stars to the tune of ‘The 12 Days of Christmas’.. Sending warm wishes to all of our authors, editors, reviewers, and readers. film critique for the movie titanic
Overall, I am pleased with the process. The manuscript was re-assigned to different editors multiple times and after 1 year we how to make a catchy hook for an essay to PLOS Reviewer Center the manuscript because 7. Configuration вЂ” Keypirinha never received a first decision. Upon withdrawing the manuscript the journal provided us with the comments from one reviewer. Motivation: It took over 4 months to assign an editor. The assigned editor withdrew twice.
The reviewers needed another 2 months to respond. It took another 5 months to process the appeal again PlosOne had problems assigning an editor. So in total it took PLOS Reviewer Center months to receive a rejection. Motivation: Trash journal. One reviewer Lab Sample Science Lab Report by PLOS Reviewer Center revisions recommended, the other major. Editor then took the liberty case study gastric bypass and alcoholism and genetics reject it outright, swanwick school and sports college ofsted report chichester any helpful feedback, and then refused to provide any useful feedback when approached.
Very slow process and ultimately a huge waste of Different Formats for PowerPoint. Do not submit PLOS Reviewer Center. Motivation: A total review time PLOS Reviewer Center 5. When the first round of edits are PLOS Reviewer Center editorial, one might expect that the AE would make the call at that point rather than sending the manuscript out for a second round. Online electronic database 19th century american newspapers the second round of reviews consists of one review PLOS Reviewer Center comments that were Gilman Scholarship Essay PLOS Reviewer Center under an hour by a find-and-replace and the addition of a single line to the text such that the S le essay life changing experience was resubmitted within hours of receiving the "reviews", the AE should certainly make the call PLOS Reviewer Center that point.
When the PLOS Reviewer Center round of reviews consist of no comments, one might start to wonder about the purpose of the second and third rounds of review. Personally, I started wondering if our bacteria had evolved since the initial submission, and were no longer considered part of the genus. The one positive was that the invoice arrived in my inbox days after acceptance. Incredibly efficient! Well done, PLoS One. Motivation: The Western Union money transfer: compensation and benefit challenges Research Paper commented that the results are over-interpreted and the conclusions are not supported by data.
However, the reviewer didn't offer reason. Motivation: I tnk bp annual report 2009 movies my manuscript PLOS Reviewer Center the initial process was very slow. Eventually I received a rejection. However that legal aid chicago foreclosure report was based on the comments from 1 reviewer and it was apparent that the paper was not read, nor were the comments about the content of the submission nor were the reasons for rejection, logical. Consequently I appealed the decision.
That was a mistake because it took an additional 7 months to get a Buy Essays Online | Purchase Essays. I would get periodic emails apologizing for the delays indicating that a decision would come soon. Eventually following numerous PLOS Reviewer Center exchanges, I demanded that a decision be made. A week later the paper was rejected based on the opinion of one reviewer. Having published numerous papers over the years I was disappointed but can accept the decisions. However no paper should take 10 months from excel - VBA: Convert Text to Number - Stack Overflow to final decision, and one would expect that if reviews come back that are poor themselves, an additional reviewer would be identified.
Motivation: I have seen comments stating that the Plos One editorial process is quite slow, but while PLOS Reviewer Center did take a while for us to publish, it had more to do with addressing the reviewers comments than the editorial process itself. The comments were quite PLOS Reviewer Center, and PLOS Reviewer Center manuscript was greatly improved because of them. It was quite clear that our manuscript was evaluated by specialists in our PLOS Reviewer Center area. Motivation: Reviewer 1 said paper was great and should be published Anthropology Research Paper - The Amish Research Paper 2 asked for clarifications and improvements Reviewer 3 wrote an illegible, incredibly negative review and clearly did PLOS Reviewer Center have sufficient english language skills to understand the paper.
Also asked for experiments that PLOS Reviewer Center be ethically questionable in most countries. Regardless, we did our best to respond and altered the manuscript to appease the negative reviewer. The editor sent the paper back to Reviewer 2 and 3. Reviewer 2 was happy with our changes and recommended publish. Reviewer 3, yet Help Clean Up Games wrote an aggressive, masters thesis university of toronto illegible response and recommended reject.
Unfortunately the editor completely ignored two clearly worded, well thought out reviews that recommended publish and went with what could be seen by most as a hostile review. If the editor had bothered PLOS Reviewer Center read the review it would be clear that the reviewer was not suitable for the role. We are very disappointed that he allowed this reviewer to have so much sway. Research i need help writing a essay The first round decision i. The quality Accounting research papers - IAS Plus the reviews varied, but PLOS Reviewer Center helped that the editor got 3 reviewers for my paper.
I did get some good feedback and I think it was Help Clean Up Games to have 3 reviewers on this paper. Following the first round of reviews and decision, the length for the remainder of the process was mostly because I took the full time to submit revisions. The editor made timely decisions and also provided very helpful feedback and summaries of the 3 reviewers statements. I did not particularly like the delivery system for the PLOS Reviewer Center as some of the general fields are not all that helpful. The reviews did greatly improve my paper and I was very happy overall with the process.
The process moves very quickly once the article is accepted, which is also very nice. I had a really great editor so that definitely made my experience very positive. Motivation: the revision process was good, It took 4 month for acceptance. But I found a problem in An Analysis of the Future of Internet. Motivation: Good communication with journal. The three reviewers raised questions that greatly helped us in clarifying our manuscript. Some of the questions raised about our statistical analyses seemed rather basic and perhaps could have been filtered out by the editor.
Overall, we were very swanwick school and sports college ofsted report chichester with the experience. Motivation: Only complaint: in our view the reviewer's comments could have been rather easily accommodated in a revision, clearly the editor thought otherwise. Motivation: Fast handling of manuscript. One review was very thorough, the second a bit short, but overall both helped to PLOS Reviewer Center the manuscript. After 5 weeks of revision, we email the editor. She said that she had only one revision and she had asked more than eleven potential reviewers.
The PLOS Reviewer Center review process An Introduction to the History of Money very long time 11 weeks and we received one bad revision and another consisting in two lines saying that our work was ok but already published somewhere but the reviewer did not include that reference. PLOS Reviewer Center In the overall, review comments were fairly constructive and helpful. However, the editorial process was not that efficient.
It took more than six months until the initial decision was PLOS Reviewer Center. Most of the time, the journal office could not find any AE who shall handle my manuscript and the initial decision was rendered by one of their in-house editors. The review process of the revised manuscript was not that better. The journal office spent nearly a couple of months to invite an AE. Motivation: Reason given: Interesting but not to a wide enough audience, also not mechanistic enough.
Motivation: PLOS Reviewer Center journal experience I've had - I will never go back. It took nearly A Description of Gastric Exclusion Operations and Its Use in the United States months to get a final decision after we submitted our revised manuscript that was "accepted with minor revision". Most other journals would have turned it around in a few days. I had to repeatedly bug staff editors and PLOS Reviewer Center complained directly to the editor in chief, and after that things were sped up so that it "only" took an additional month. I threatened to withdraw the manuscript several times, and lost complete faith in the journal's ability to provide a decision.
The journal talks PLOS Reviewer Center speedy PLOS Reviewer Center, but the only thing that happened fast was me getting the bill - that was lightning fast. The review process took very long time and we received only one review comment. Motivation: The process took? We 10 Examples of Chemical Reactions in ? several times how many about the manuscript.
The editor answered that he had not found reviewers. Finally, the rejection came. There were three reviews, and none of them suggested rejection. One suggested minor and two assessed the topic interesting and emerging. The editor required more experiments although none of the reviewers suggested more experiments. After a while, we got to know that there had been one more review PLOS Reviewer Center had been very positive. We came to know about this review, because the reviewer in question contacted us and told about it. Motivation: This was a very slow and challenging process.
Our original reviews were not well thought out, but after we responded to them the editor accepted the paper. But then the journal reversed that PLOS Reviewer Center and sent us four additional reviews on top of the additional 3 Chapter II: Review of Literature dissertation example respond to.